
"Eric the Red was from Chad." So this is the “we wuz” delusion that set the standard for all the other utter low-IQ nonsense: the claim that the Vikings were black.

The pale-haired maniacs from Scandinavia—the men who wrote sagas about axe-murdering their neighbors and paddled long-ships to America a thousand years before Columbus—were, in fact (you guessed it), from sub-Saharan Africa.

The race-revisionist fan club says so. So it must be true. Who started this nonsense? The whole thing starts with a couple of Netflix producers deciding, in their infinite wisdom, to cast a black woman as Jarl Haakon in Vikings: Valhalla.

Now, don’t get me wrong—I love a bit of fantasy. But when you’re turning an epic Norwegian warlord into something that looks like it came out of a Hollywood blockbuster, it’s not history anymore. It’s pantomime. And of course, the internet ran with it. Suddenly, we had overnight historians spouting off about the blámenn in Old Norse texts, which in their minds means the Vikings were African.
Blámenn literally meant “blue men” or “dark foreigners”—the Norsemen’s word for strangers they met abroad, like Moors or Ethiopians. It did not mean that Eric the Red was secretly from Chad.

Now, let’s look at the facts. In 2020, a massive study was published in Nature where scientists sequenced the DNA of 442 skeletons from across the Viking world. You know what they found? The Vikings were—now sit down before you collapse from the revelation—Scandinavians. They clustered genetically with modern Norwegians, Swedes, and Danes. There were signs of mixing, of course, because the Vikings didn’t just raid, they bred their way across Europe. They picked up a bit of Irish, a bit of British, some southern European here and there. But NO!, they weren’t secretly Zulus in horned helmets. The closest thing they had to African ancestry was probably the goat they stole on the way to the Mediterranean.
Take the Salme ship burial in Estonia: four brothers and a cousin buried together after dying in battle on a raid. DNA analysis showed they were close Scandinavian kin—real Vikings, real family, real bloodlines.
So why is it that not a single published Viking-age burial genome shows sub-Saharan African ancestry?
And if you look at the traits, these men already carried the lactase-persistence allele (meaning they could drink milk into adulthood) and had pigmentation profiles consistent with modern Scandinavians: predominantly light skin, hair ranging from blonde to brown to red, and plenty of blue-green eyes. Not exactly what you see in certain streaming network propaganda.
The whole “black Viking” claim is so insulting. These were men who could row a ship across the North Sea in the middle of winter, leap ashore, burn your village, and be back home in time to sacrifice a goat to Odin. The truth is simple: Vikings were Scandinavian. But hey—give it a thousand years, a Netflix deal, and suddenly every black man is a Viking. Doesn’t matter if your ancestors were herding goats in the Sahara or chasing hyenas off a carcass. Now it’s “we wuz Vikings.”

- Log in to post comments